Protecting Her Brand: Contextualizing the Production and Publication of L.M. Montgomery’s “The Alpine Path”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alpine Path: The Story of My Career is L.M. Montgomery's longest, most detailed public representation of her life and career. It was originally published in six installments in the popular Canadian magazine, Everywoman's World , in 1917 and reformatted and reprinted again in 1974 and 2005. In order to understand how this autobiography was used by Montgomery to shape her public image, Katja Lee argues that it is necessary to return to the contexts of its original production and publication. Using media articles, Montgomery's journals, and the 1917 edition of her memoir (recently made available through Early Canadiana Online ), this article compares Montgomery's strategies of self-representation in this life-writing text with her strategies for managing the growing media interest in her life. It also explores how the domestic mandate of the magazine and the relationship of the memoir installments to advertisements and other articles in each issue would have shaped how her audience read and understood her narrative, critical contexts that are missing from contemporary editions of Alpine Path.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.037 | 0.034 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.019 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".