MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1511553427

Antenna allocation for MIMO radars with collocated antennas

2012· article· en· W1511553427 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Information Fusion · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadar Systems and Signal Processing
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCramér–Rao boundMIMOAntenna (radio)Upper and lower boundsComputer scienceRadarMathematical optimizationDirectional antennaConvex optimizationElectronic engineeringAlgorithmMathematicsRegular polygonTelecommunicationsEngineeringEstimation theory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the antenna allocation problem in Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) radar systems with collocated antennas. After deriving the Cramer-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB) as the cost function, the optimal distribution of antennas is found by applying the relevant operators to the CRLB. A convex optimization algorithm is then proposed to find the optimum distribution of antennas that achieves the optimal CRLB. It is also shown that the optimization problem can be simplified to the well-known Semi-definite Programming (SDP) for a single target scenario. Using a number of simulations, it is shown that the localization algorithm also leads to superior results when the optimal antenna configuration is used.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it