DIDMA: A Distributed Intrusion Detection System Using Mobile Agents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The widespread proliferation of Internet connections has made current computer networks more vulnerable to intrusions than before. In network intrusions, there may be multiple computing nodes that are attacked by intruders. The evidences of intrusions have to be gathered from all such attacked nodes. An intruder may move between multiple nodes in the network to conceal the origin of attack, or misuse some compromised hosts to launch the attack on other nodes. To detect such intrusion activities spread over the whole network, we present a new intrusion detection system (IDS) called distributed intrusion detection using mobile agents (DIDMA). DIDMA uses a set of software entities called mobile agents that can move from one node to another node within a network, and perform the task of aggregation and correlation of the intrusion related data that it receives from another set of software entities called the static agents. Mobile agents reduce network bandwidth usage by moving data analysis computation to the location of the intrusion data, support heterogeneous plat-forms, and offer a lot of flexibility in creating a distributed IDS. DIDMA utilizes the above-mentioned beneficial features offered by mobile agent technology and addresses some of the issues with centralized IDS models. The detailed architecture and implementation of a prototype of DIDMA are described. It has been tested using some well-known attacks and performances have been corn-pared with centralized IDS models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".