MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1511840833

A global optimal technique based on Moving Least Square and Improved Differential Evolution

2008· article· en· W1511840833 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenchmark (surveying)Differential evolutionMathematical optimizationGlobal optimizationSquare (algebra)InverseComputer scienceAlgorithmFunction (biology)Differential (mechanical device)Inverse problemSurface (topology)ElectromagneticsMathematicsEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a global optimal technique based on moving least square (MLS) fitting technique and improved differential evolution algorithm (IDEA) for inverse problems on optimizing electromagnetic equipments. In the proposed method, MLS are firstly used to simulate complex objective functions as a response surface model (RSM) in multidimensional space, for transforming an implicit function to an explicit one, then differential evolution algorithm (DEA) is improved and used by combining with MLS to get the global optimization with high accuracy and efficiency. TEAM Workshop Problem 22, as numerical benchmark, indicates that the proposed method is superior to other random optimal techniques, and it can be comprehensively used for inverse problems in engineering electromagnetic applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it