MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1511922369

Panel description: Computer-supported collaborative learning and ODL for informal groups

2006· article· en· W1511922369 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kodhandaraman Balasubramanian, Krishna Alluri, Surabhi Banerjee, Terrence Philips, Guyana Caribbean Regional Fisheries Mechanism, Peter Fenrich, John Dada, Jennipher Kere, Collins Osei

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Fourth Pan-Commonwealth Forum on Open Learning (PCF4). · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicICT in Developing Communities
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLifelong learningInformal learningPublic relationsKnowledge managementCollaborative learningProcess (computing)TamilInformation and Communications TechnologySociologyAsynchronous communicationPolitical scienceBusinessPedagogyComputer scienceWorld Wide WebTelecommunications
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Lifelong Learning for Farmers (L3 Farmers) Project of COL in Tamil Nadu, India, focuses on enhancing the self-directed personal strategic learning as an important strategy in ODL for informal groups. ICT plays a key role. The project has emphasized the importance of mobilization phase, manifesting the principle of participation of various stakeholders through organized and systematic actions. Mobilization involves mutual conscientization in which various stakeholders understand each other’s agenda. Collaboration assumes importance and L3 Farmers shows that Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning is a key factor in the ODL for Informal Groups. Collaboration, which is a coordinated, synchronous activity that is the result of a continued attempt to construct and maintain a shared conception of a problem, is the characteristic of a learning community. Other major social and structural differences impede collaboration and diffuse the learning community. Hence development programmes have to lay major emphasis on the process of mobilization. Computers can enhance collaboration through four types of interactions: - at the computers - around computers - related to computer applications, and - through computers. This study analyses the role of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated collaborations in five villages. The study throws new light on the theoretical perspectives of ODL for informal groups and offers a roadmap for building alternative strategies for reaching the unreached. Panel Members: Professor Surabhi Banerjee, Vice-Chancellor, Netaji Subhas Open University (NSOU), India Mr. Peter Fenrich, Project Leader/Instructional Multimedia Designer, British Columbia Institute of Technology (BCIT), Canada Dr. Terrence Philips, Fisheries Management and Development Manager, Caribbean Regional Fisheries Mechanism (CRFM), Guyana Mr. John Dada, Executive Director, FANTSUAM Foundation, Nigeria Ms Jennipher Kere, Managing Trustee, Women In Fishing Industry Programme (WIFIP), Kenya Dr. Collins Osei, Crops Research Institute, Ghana

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Fourth Pan-Commonwealth Forum on Open Learning (PCF4).Same topicICT in Developing CommunitiesFrench-language works237,207