Une méthodologie de conception pour la fabrication additive
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les méthodologies de Design for Assembly et de Design for Manufacturing visent à rendre les produits plus faciles à fabriquer et à assembler en se basant sur les caractéristiques des procédés actuels de fabrication, toutefois ces caractéristiques ne s'appliquent plus lorsqu'on prend en compte les nouvelles capacités de la Fabrication Additive. Cet article décrit une méthodologie de conception pour la Fabrication Additive qui guide l'utilisateur vers l'optimisation d'un produit en utilisant les capacités de ces nouveaux procédés de fabrication. La méthodologie proposée est ensuite appliquée à un assemblage mécanique. Abstract - Design for Assembly and Design for Manufacturing methodologies aim to make products easier to manufacture and assemble by basing itself off the characteristics of actual manufacturing processes, however these characteristics aren't applicable when taking into account the new capabilities of Additive Manufacturing. This article describes a design methodology for Additive Manufacturing which guides the users towards the optimization of a product using the capabilities of these fabrication processes. The proposed methodology is then applied to a mechanical assembly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it