Reentrant spin glass state induced by structural phase transition in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
$\mathrm{L}{\mathrm{a}}_{0.4}\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{e}}_{0.6}\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{o}}_{2}{\mathrm{P}}_{2}$ represents a borderline case in the range of solid solutions formed in the pseudobinary system $\mathrm{LaC}{\mathrm{o}}_{2}{\mathrm{P}}_{2}\text{\ensuremath{-}}\mathrm{CeC}{\mathrm{o}}_{2}{\mathrm{P}}_{2}$. The material undergoes ferromagnetic ordering at \ensuremath{\sim}225 K followed by a structural collapse at \ensuremath{\sim}190 K, which leads to a strong suppression of magnetization. The structural phase transition manifests itself in a gradual decrease in the parameter $c$ and a relatively smaller increase of the parameter $a$ of the tetragonal lattice. Interestingly, a combination of magnetic measurements and nonpolarized and polarized neutron scattering experiments suggests that the structural collapse does not lead to an antiferromagnetically ordered state, observed in samples with the higher Ce content. On the contrary, $\mathrm{L}{\mathrm{a}}_{0.4}\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{e}}_{0.6}\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{o}}_{2}{\mathrm{P}}_{2}$ appears to enter a disordered, spin glass state, with gradual dissipation of the ferromagnetic ordering taking place simultaneously with the structural collapse, as evidenced by temperature-dependent measurements of the depolarization factor for a polarized neutron beam passing through the sample. The observed behavior is analogous to that reported for so-called reentrant spin glasses. In the present case, however, the appearance of the reentrant spin glass regime is caused not by tuning the chemical composition but by the structural phase transition. Electronic structure calculations confirm that the loss of magnetic ordering is caused by the subtle change to the density of states at the Fermi level due to the variation of the crystal structure of the material.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.938 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".