MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1512068145 · doi:10.4000/leportique.1354

La subjectivité mondiale.

2007· article· fr· W1512068145 on OpenAlex
François Fourquet

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLe Portique · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsEmployment and Social Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mon exposé prend sa source dans les idées exprimées par Félix Guattari au cours des années précédant la rencontre avec Gilles Deleuze (qui date de 1969) et publiées dans Psychanalyse et transversalité (1972). Félix était d’abord un parlant ; sa parole jaillissait comme une source ; il n’était pas à l’aise dans l’écriture. Malgré l’évolution des concepts, il y a une étonnante continuité de l’article inaugural « La transversalité » (1964), à Chaos­mose, son dernier livre, publié en 1992. Félix a été inspiré toute sa vie par une vision première, une « intuition philosophique » qui a traversé sans dommage la moulinette du travail deleuzo-guattarien ; elle tient tout entière dans une affirmation ontologique. Il existe une subjectivité sociale mondiale porteuse de vie et de désir, inaccessible au moi, et transversale aux grands ensembles institutionnels hiérarchisés qui prétendent gouverner le monde. La « subjectivité mondiale » ne figure pas sous ce nom dans les écrits de Félix.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.624
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it