Representations of Endometriosis in the Popular Press: "The Career Woman's Disease"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study explores how endometriosis is represented in the popular press.Content analysis of sixty-four magazine articles published between 1975 and 2001 was conducted.Common themes appearing in magazine articles were examined.Results indicate the popular press represents endometriosis primarily as a fertility problem.Improvements in media coverage of endometriosis are recommended. RESUMECet article explore la fafon dont la presse populaire represente l'endometriose.Une etude de I'analyse de soixante-quatre articles de revues a ete menee.Les themes communs qui apparaissent dans ies revues ont ete etudies.Les resultats indiquent que la presse populaire represente l'endometriose principalement en tant qu'un probleme de fertilite.L'article recommande que les medias ameliorent la facon dont ils couvrent l'endometriose.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".