Nanoscale cF96 cubic versus icosahedral phase in devitrified Hf-based metallic glasses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The devitrification behaviour of the rapidly solidified quaternary hafnium-based alloys of Hf65NM17.5TM10Al7.5 composition (NM- noble metal, TM- 3d transition metal) was studied using differential scanning calorimetry. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the influence of composition on the devitrification products at the primary stage. The structure was analysed by using X-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy. The formation of the nanoparticles of the Hf-based quasicrystalline icosahedral or cubic cF96 Fd3−m Ti2Ni-type phase about 10 nm in size was observed at the primary devitrification stage in different metallic glasses with close compositions. The icosahedral phase consists of 137-atom Bergmann rhombic triacontahedra. The alloys in systems in which the stable Hf-based cF96 phase exists do not show the formation of the icosahedral phase from the amorphous matrix. The cF96 phase and the icosahedral phase formed by primary devitrification from the amorphous phase may inherit the local order of the icosahedral clusters in the amorphous matrix.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".