La paradoja del gobierno autoritario: organización de los sectores populares en los ochenta y promesa de inclusión
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"El artículo analiza la naturaleza de las actividades de organización de los sectores popularesdurante el gobierno militar. Su propósito es demostrar cómo tales actividades, de manera paradojal,comenzaron a culminar en la creación de un nuevo actor social. Se examina a continuación laforma en que este proceso naciente de formación de un movimiento social se vio coartado, poruna parte, por la decisión de los principales partidos políticos de oposición, de adoptar unaestrategia de transición basada en ganar el plebiscito de 1988, y por otra parte por la transiciónen sí misma. El artículo concluye sugiriendo que la ausencia de tal actor entre los sectorespopulares puede tener consecuencias prácticas importantes para la capacidad de la democraciachilena de enfrentar al menos dos de los retos más importantes para el país: la reformaeducativa y la respuesta a los crecientes índices de delincuencia."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".