MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1512349594

Plan de Negocio Almacenes Eco

2014· dissertation· es· W1512349594 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Segura Rojas, Jonathan Antony

Bibliographic record

Venueinstname:Universidad del Rosario · 2014
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBusiness, Innovation, and Economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceGeographyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El presente trabajo tiene el fin de mostrar el modelo de negocio de Almacenes Eco y el plan de empresa para el mismo. El objetivo principal es el diseno del plan para un primer establecimiento fisico que luego sera escalable y repetible para los siguientes almacenes. Las caracteristicas principales de este proyecto son: la propuesta de valor, modelo de negocio, orientacion estrategica, analisis de mercado, plan financiero, plan economico, estrategias de mercadeo, operativa y administrativa. El surgimiento del proyecto fue a causa de la inexistencia de cadenas de almacenes que ofrecen productos economicos de buena calidad en Colombia. En paises como Inglaterra, Estados Unidos y Canada existen cadenas de almacenes como: Poundland, 99p stores y family dollar quienes ofrecen productos relacionados con bebidas y comidas; salud y belleza; jardineria y hogar; entretenimiento; celebraciones y fiestas; ninos y bebes y todo lo relacionado con las temporadas del ano a un solo precio o un precio inferior al senalado. La metodologia empleada para la investigacion se realizo con una serie de encuestas, entrevistas, investigacion documental e investigacion de campo que permitio conocer las necesidades reales de los habitantes de la localidad de suba.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueinstname:Universidad del RosarioSame topicBusiness, Innovation, and EconomyFrench-language works237,207