MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1512425967 · doi:10.5860/choice.188297

Redemption songs: suing for freedom before Dred Scott

2015· article· en· W1512425967 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueChoice Reviews Online · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLawArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. How Frontier Slaves Came to be Entitled to Lawyers 2. How it Came about that a Native American Pedigree Meant Freedom: Celeste's Extended Family 3. John Merry a/k/a Jean Marie: Redemption Over and Over Again 4. The Children of Canadienne Rose 5. Winny, the Mother of Frontier Redemptions 6. The Duncan Brothers in Black and White 7. The Mass Kidnapping of Lydia's Children 8. Masters, Lovers, Husbands, Mates, Both Black and White 8 a. Betrayal and Deceit: Eliza Tyler's Redemption 8 b. Devotion and Death: Maria Whiten's Redemption 8 c. The Prerogative of One's Master to Change His Mind? Hester Norcom's Redemption 9. The Slaves of Milton Duty 10. David Shipman's Fidelity to the Spirit of Liberty 11. Mr. and Mrs. Dred Scott: Taking it to the Federal Level- If a Slave Litigates on the Frontier Does it Make Any Sound?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChoice Reviews OnlineSame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207