Optimization of the Exhaust Mass Flow Rate and Coolant Temperature for Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) Cooling Devices Used in Diesel Engines
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<div class="htmlview paragraph">An experimental investigation was conducted to characterize the operational transients of a small-scale 6-tube exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) cooling device, designed to simulate operating conditions of commercial devices, for a wide range of exhaust mass flow rates and different coolant temperatures. The transient pressure drop across the device and the thermal performance were measured for exhaust mass flow rates varying over a full range typically used in commercial devices. The coolant temperatures tested ranged from 25 °C to 55 °C. The temperature distribution on the outer shell surface of the small-scale EGR cooling device was also measured periodically using a thermal imaging camera to characterize the secondary side flow in the experiments. The results show that both the exhaust mass flow rate and the coolant temperature had a significant influence on the transient performance of the 6-tube EGR cooling device.</div>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it