MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1512540778

Timed State Tree Structures: Supervisory Control and Fault Diagnosis

2010· dissertation· en· W1512540778 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ali Saadatpoor

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace (University of Toronto) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPetri Nets in System Modeling
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsSupervisory controlState (computer science)Fault tree analysisComputer scienceProcess (computing)State spaceFault (geology)Tree (set theory)Event (particle physics)Finite-state machineDistributed computingEvent treeAutomatonReal-time computingControl engineeringControl (management)AlgorithmTheoretical computer scienceEngineeringMathematicsReliability engineeringArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is well known that the optimal nonblocking supervisory control problem of timed discrete event systems is NP-hard, subject in particular to state space explosion that is exponential in the number of system components. In this thesis, we propose to manage complexity by organizing the system as a Timed State Tree Structure (TSTS). TSTS are an adaptation of STS to timed Supervisory Control Theory (SCT). Based on TSTS we present an e±cient recursive symbolic algorithm that can perform nonblocking supervisory control design for systems of state size 10^12 and higher.
\nFailure diagnosis is the process of detecting and identifying deviations of a system from its normal behavior using the information available through sensors. A method for fault diagnosis of the TSTS model is proposed. A state based diagnoser is constructed for each timed holon of TSTS. Fault diagnosis is accomplished using the state estimates provided by the timed holon diagnosers. The diagnosers may communicate among each other in order to update their state estimates. At any given time, only a subset of the diagnosers are operational, and as a result, instead of the entire model of the system, only the models of the timed holons associated with the operational diagnosers are used.
\nIt is shown that the computational complexity of constructing and storing the transition systems required for diagnosis in the proposed approach is polynomial in the number of system components, whereas in the original monolithic approach the computational complexity is exponential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace (University of Toronto)Same topicPetri Nets in System ModelingFrench-language works237,207