Effects of the P-Selectin Antagonist Inclacumab on Myocardial Damage After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Non–ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to evaluate inclacumab for the reduction of myocardial damage during a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: P-selectin is an adhesion molecule involved in interactions between endothelial cells, platelets, and leukocytes. Inclacumab is a recombinant monoclonal antibody against P-selectin, with potential anti-inflammatory, antithrombotic, and antiatherogenic properties. METHODS: Patients (N = 544) with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction scheduled for coronary angiography and possible ad hoc PCI were randomized to receive 1 pre-procedural infusion of inclacumab 5 or 20 mg/kg or placebo. The primary endpoint, evaluated in patients who underwent PCI, received study medication, and had available efficacy data (n = 322), was the change in troponin I from baseline at 16 and 24 h after PCI. RESULTS: There was no effect of inclacumab 5 mg/kg. Placebo-adjusted geometric mean percent changes in troponin I with inclacumab 20 mg/kg were -24.4% at 24 h (p = 0.05) and -22.4% at 16 h (p = 0.07). Peak troponin I was reduced by 23.8% (p = 0.05) and area under the curve over 24 h by 33.9% (p = 0.08). Creatine kinase-myocardial band yielded similar results, with changes of -17.4% at 24 h (p = 0.06) and -16.3% at 16 h (p = 0.09). The incidence of creatine kinase-myocardial band increases >3 times the upper limit of normal within 24 h was 18.3% and 8.9% in the placebo and inclacumab 20-mg/kg groups, respectively (p = 0.05). Placebo-adjusted changes in soluble P-selectin level were -9.5% (p = 0.25) and -22.0% (p < 0.01) with inclacumab 5 and 20 mg/kg. There was no significant difference in adverse events between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Inclacumab appears to reduce myocardial damage after PCI in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. (A Study of RO4905417 in Patients With Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction [Non-STEMI] Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; NCT01327183).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".