La competencia como organizadora de los programas de formación : hacia un desempeño competente
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Los autores del presente trabajo son investigadores del Observatorio de Reformas \nEducativas (ORE) de la Universidad de Quebec en Montreal (UQAM), presentan una \nreflexión teórica y práctica sobre el uso del concepto de competencia como organizador de \nprogramas de estudios. Partiendo del origen del concepto y su aplicación en los distintos \ncampos disciplinares que lo han utilizado, proponen una perspectiva contextualizada. \nInspirados principalmente en el enfoque de la didáctica profesional y en los \ntrabajos de Philippe Jonnaert, desde los años 1980, los autores demuestran que los tres \npilares para el desarrollo de las competencias son: las situaciones, el desempeño \ncompetente y la inteligencia de las situaciones. \nFinalmente, a partir de experiencias llevadas a cabo en Canadá y Níger, los \nautores ilustran una de ellas y se permiten cuestionar los contenidos de los programas de \nestudios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it