ANÁLISE DA INFLUÊNCIA DA EFICIÊNCIA ORGANIZACIONAL NO VALOR DE MERCADO DAS CONSTRUTORAS BRASILEIRAS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to analyze, from the first quarter of 2010 and the fourth quarter of 2012, the correlation between Organizational Efficiency Ratio (IEO), as proposed by Albuquerque and Alencar (2009), and the market value (approximated by Market Capitalization) of the ten companies in the construction sector listed on the BM &FBovespa with higher gross revenue in 2011. for this, the work in question has adapted the methodology proposed by the authors cited to investigate, besides the mentioned correlation, the correlation between the evolution of the Market capitalization over the Selic rate and the Ibovespa, in order to understand which index has better explanatory power on the variation of the Market Capitalization. The results showed that in the period considered, the correlation between the Organizational Efficiency Index and the Market Capitalization was not strong between the cases. The same happened in relation to the Selic rate. The Ibovespa, in turn, showed a strong correlation with the Market Capitalization of the undertakings concerned during the period in analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".