MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1512880306 · doi:10.7202/045756ar

L’intellectuel et le lion

2011· article· fr· W1512880306 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jocelyne Mathieu

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers des dix · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre de réadaptation Lethbridge-Layton-MackayEspace pour la vie
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le texte sur Jacques Rousseau a comme premier objectif de faire connaître l’existence du Fonds gigantesque de ce scientifique important, déposé aux Archives de folklore et d’ethnologie de l’Université Laval. Il vise aussi à faire ressortir quelques aspects de la vie d’un intellectuel remarquable qui a occupé une place de premier plan au Québec, au Canada et dans le monde, et qui a ouvert de multiples voies de recherche. Son érudition, ses pratiques multidisciplinaires, son rayonnement national et international ont fait en sorte que Jacques Rousseau exerce encore une influence incontestable dans plusieurs domaines des sciences de la nature et des sciences humaines. De plus, tous ceux qui l’ont connu attestent, à l’oral comme à l’écrit, de son tempérament fougueux, de sa personnalité imposante et de ses qualités de cœur.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers des dixSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207