MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1512902407 · doi:10.1080/03632415.2015.1038380

A Tool Supporting the Extraction of Angling Effort Data from Remote Camera Images

2015· article· en· W1512902407 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFisheries · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsFreshwater Fisheries Society of BCUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFishingComputer scienceExtraction (chemistry)Remote sensingComputer visionFisheryData scienceArtificial intelligenceGeographyBiologyChemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Estimating angling effort on more than a few lakes can be prohibitively expensive using creel surveys and often requires finer-scale angler distribution data than aerial surveys can provide. An alternate method uses remote cameras to capture images of lakes at hourly intervals over long time periods. Technicians then visually analyze the thousands of generated images for features of interest (e.g., angler counts and environmental conditions) and use those data to estimate angling effort. The problem is that the visual analysis step is time-consuming, expensive, and difficult to validate. Consequently, we elicited the strategies and best practices technicians used when analyzing images and identified bottlenecks. We then designed software, called Timelapse to better support image analysis. In use for several years, Timelapse has proven a cost-effective method of estimating angling effort in British Columbia's small lakes fisheries; it significantly eases a technician's workflow and doubles the number of images one can process per hour. La estimación del esfuerzo de pesca con anzuelo que se realiza en varios lagos mediante muestreos en puerto, puede llegar a tener costos prohibitivos y suele requerir una información más fina sobre la distribución del esfuerzo que la que proveen los muestreos aéreos. Un método alternativo se basa en la captura de imágenes de los lagos usando cámaras remotas, tomadas cada hora durante largos periodos. Posteriormente, los cientos de imágenes generadas son analizadas visualmente por los técnicos con el fin de detectar características de interés (v.g. conteo de pescadores y condiciones ambientales) y esta información se usa para estimar el esfuerzo de pesca. El problema es que el análisis visual consume mucho tiempo, es caro y difícil de validar. En consecuencia, en este trabajo se elucidan las estrategias y mejores prácticas que el personal técnico utiliza al analizar las imágenes e identificar cuellos de botella. Posteriormente se diseña un programa llamado Timelapse, como apoyo para el análisis de imágenes. Habiendo sido utilizado por varios años, Timelapse ha mostrado ser un método efectivo en cuanto a costos para estimar el esfuerzo en pesquerías de pequeños lagos en la Columbia Británica; alivia de forma importante el flujo de trabajo del personal técnico y duplica el número de imágenes que pueden procesarse en una hora.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.483
Threshold uncertainty score0.860

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it