PULMONARY PAPILLARY ADENOMA IN A DOG: A CASE REPORT / Adenoma papilar pulmonar em cão: relato de caso.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente trabalho objetiva relatar um caso de adenoma papilar pulmonar, tumor benigno raro, com poucos relatos na literatura. A casuistica refere a um cão, macho, sem raça definida, adulto sênior, procedente do Centro de Controle de Zoonoses de Belém-PA, encaminhado ao Setor de Patologia Animal da Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia. No exame anatomopatológico foi observado nódulo esbranquiçado circunscrito no lobo diafragmático do pulmão direito. Histopatologicamente, as margens do crescimento tumoral não estavam limitadas por pseudo-cápsula. As células tinham morfologia cuboidal e/ou prismática, sem atipia, dispondo-se colunarmente, num padrão de crescimento papilar. O achado dessa forma tumoral é inteiramente incidental, portanto apresenta poucos casos descritos na literatura, entretanto o processo pode ser precisamente diagnosticado por meio de suas características histopatológicas únicas.SUMMARYThis study reports a case of pulmonary papillary adenoma, which is a rare benign tumor of the lungs, with just a few cases described in the literature. The study refers to an adult, male, mixed breed dog from the Zoonoses Control Center of Belém, PA, Brazil, that was referred to the sector of Veterinary Pathology of the Federal Rural University of Amazônia. During the anathomopathological examination, a circumscribed whitish nodule in the diaphragmatic lobe of the right lung was observed. Histopathologically, tumor growing margins were not limited by the pseudo-capsule. The cells had cuboidal morphology (or prismatic-like) without atypia, standing in columns, in a papillary growth pattern. These types of tumor findings are completely incidental. Therefore, there are few cases described in the literature. Nevertheless, the process may be precisely identified by analyzing its unique histopathological characteristics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".