MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1513313232 · doi:10.1353/mod.2013.0094

Getting Mary Married by Allan Dwan (review)

2013· article· en· W1513313232 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueModernism/modernity · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCinema and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHollywoodStudioArt historyPerformance artMovie theaterArtHistoryCharacter (mathematics)Visual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Getting Mary Married by Allan Dwan Katherine Groo Getting Mary Married. Allan Dwan, dir. Starring Marion Davies and Norman Kerry, with a new score by David Knutson. Grapevine Video, 2013 (1919). 1 DVD. $16.95. The restoration and re-release of Getting Mary Married—a comedic Cinderella story about an orphan (Marion Davies) imprisoned by a wealthy Bostonian family—coincides with a wave of renewed interest in the work of Allan Dwan (1885-1981). Dwan was a Canadian-born Hollywood director whose career began in 1911 and concluded some four hundred films and five decades later in 1961. This summer, the Museum of Modern Art in New York City hosted a month-long, fifty-film retrospective dedicated to Dwan. The event took its title from Frederic Lombardi's recently published monograph, Allan Dwan and the Rise and Decline of the Hollywood Studios (2013). In June, the Lumière journal published an enormous Dwan anthology, edited by David Phelps and Gina Telaroli. This collection gathers together nearly five hundred pages of essays and interviews in five different languages, all devoted to just one figure in film history. In taking Dwan as their organizing principle, these diverse projects mimic the unwieldy size and shape that defined his prolific career. They likewise share in the same auteurist commitments that guided film criticism in the mid-twentieth century. Contributors to the French film journal Cahiers du Cinéma—among them, Jean-Luc Godard, Jacques Rivette, Éric Rohmer, and François Truffaut—spent the 1950s recuperating a handful of Hollywood directors from the [End Page 804] anonymity of industrial film production. For this constellation of critics (and soon-to-be avant-garde auteurs), there were artists hiding in the heap of studio cinema. The Cahiers collective read visual and narrative patterns as signs of those rare cinematic stylists who managed to transform the automatic image into an autographic art. Dwan was one of their chosen few directors; his signature stretched from silence to sound, across multiple genres and hundreds of films. Getting Mary Married demonstrates Dwan's tendency to experiment with space and mise-en-scène, perhaps more than any other aspect of his cinematic style.1 His camera drifts to the ground, beneath tables, and behind furniture, defamiliarizing domestic interiors and drawing our attention to the mechanics of cinematic spectatorship. Like his contemporary John Ford, Dwan uses the structures of windows and thresholds to emphasize social enclosures and the rigidity of an upper-class family. He plays with mirrors in several scenes, a technique that confuses the boundary between on-screen and off-screen space, but also stages a decidedly cinematic encounter between reality and its double. And in one of the most visually complex shots, Dwan anticipates the deep focus and perspectival compositions that define the work of Orson Welles. He positions three characters in a backlit mise-en-scène: two in the background, each framed by a window, and one in the foreground, framed by the two still silhouettes in the distance. Click for larger view View full resolution Still from Getting Mary Married, dir. Allan Dwan One might equally detect traces of Dwan's precise, architectural style in the film's efficient editing and compact narrative structure. In an interview with Peter Bogdanovich in 1971, Dwan claims, "I was working economically . . . in terms of engineering or mathematics—the elimination of extraneous matter."2 Indeed, Getting Mary Married manages to move its titular character from orphan to newlywed in just over an hour. The film excludes many of the visual forms that [End Page 805] appeared in the transitional era, slowing the frenetic pace of early cinema: close-ups, inserts, cutaways, establishing shots, etc. In this film, each shot operates in the service of narrative progression and the cut becomes a vast container for "extraneous" narrative matter (for example, the death of Mary's stepfather, her move from New York to Boston, her months-long courtship with the "most desirable bachelor"). Parallel editing likewise produces a rhythmic play between opposing characters. This device emphasizes a rigorous narrative balance, whereby each action or actor is paired with its narrative counterpoint. It also ensures that the film keeps a quick...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.553
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it