MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1513313232 · doi:10.1353/mod.2013.0094

Getting Mary Married by Allan Dwan (review)

2013· article· en· W1513313232 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katherine Groo

Notice bibliographique

RevueModernism/modernity · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueCinema and Media Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHollywoodStudioArt historyPerformance artMovie theaterArtHistoryCharacter (mathematics)Visual arts

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Getting Mary Married by Allan Dwan Katherine Groo Getting Mary Married. Allan Dwan, dir. Starring Marion Davies and Norman Kerry, with a new score by David Knutson. Grapevine Video, 2013 (1919). 1 DVD. $16.95. The restoration and re-release of Getting Mary Married—a comedic Cinderella story about an orphan (Marion Davies) imprisoned by a wealthy Bostonian family—coincides with a wave of renewed interest in the work of Allan Dwan (1885-1981). Dwan was a Canadian-born Hollywood director whose career began in 1911 and concluded some four hundred films and five decades later in 1961. This summer, the Museum of Modern Art in New York City hosted a month-long, fifty-film retrospective dedicated to Dwan. The event took its title from Frederic Lombardi's recently published monograph, Allan Dwan and the Rise and Decline of the Hollywood Studios (2013). In June, the Lumière journal published an enormous Dwan anthology, edited by David Phelps and Gina Telaroli. This collection gathers together nearly five hundred pages of essays and interviews in five different languages, all devoted to just one figure in film history. In taking Dwan as their organizing principle, these diverse projects mimic the unwieldy size and shape that defined his prolific career. They likewise share in the same auteurist commitments that guided film criticism in the mid-twentieth century. Contributors to the French film journal Cahiers du Cinéma—among them, Jean-Luc Godard, Jacques Rivette, Éric Rohmer, and François Truffaut—spent the 1950s recuperating a handful of Hollywood directors from the [End Page 804] anonymity of industrial film production. For this constellation of critics (and soon-to-be avant-garde auteurs), there were artists hiding in the heap of studio cinema. The Cahiers collective read visual and narrative patterns as signs of those rare cinematic stylists who managed to transform the automatic image into an autographic art. Dwan was one of their chosen few directors; his signature stretched from silence to sound, across multiple genres and hundreds of films. Getting Mary Married demonstrates Dwan's tendency to experiment with space and mise-en-scène, perhaps more than any other aspect of his cinematic style.1 His camera drifts to the ground, beneath tables, and behind furniture, defamiliarizing domestic interiors and drawing our attention to the mechanics of cinematic spectatorship. Like his contemporary John Ford, Dwan uses the structures of windows and thresholds to emphasize social enclosures and the rigidity of an upper-class family. He plays with mirrors in several scenes, a technique that confuses the boundary between on-screen and off-screen space, but also stages a decidedly cinematic encounter between reality and its double. And in one of the most visually complex shots, Dwan anticipates the deep focus and perspectival compositions that define the work of Orson Welles. He positions three characters in a backlit mise-en-scène: two in the background, each framed by a window, and one in the foreground, framed by the two still silhouettes in the distance. Click for larger view View full resolution Still from Getting Mary Married, dir. Allan Dwan One might equally detect traces of Dwan's precise, architectural style in the film's efficient editing and compact narrative structure. In an interview with Peter Bogdanovich in 1971, Dwan claims, "I was working economically . . . in terms of engineering or mathematics—the elimination of extraneous matter."2 Indeed, Getting Mary Married manages to move its titular character from orphan to newlywed in just over an hour. The film excludes many of the visual forms that [End Page 805] appeared in the transitional era, slowing the frenetic pace of early cinema: close-ups, inserts, cutaways, establishing shots, etc. In this film, each shot operates in the service of narrative progression and the cut becomes a vast container for "extraneous" narrative matter (for example, the death of Mary's stepfather, her move from New York to Boston, her months-long courtship with the "most desirable bachelor"). Parallel editing likewise produces a rhythmic play between opposing characters. This device emphasizes a rigorous narrative balance, whereby each action or actor is paired with its narrative counterpoint. It also ensures that the film keeps a quick...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,034
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,113

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0340,010

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,216
Écart entre enseignants0,187 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueModernism/modernityMême sujetCinema and Media StudiesTravaux en français237 207