Estimation of the pressing force in blade forming application
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We develop a 3-D FE model to simulate the hot forming process for the turbine blades based on elastic-plastic theory and unilateral contact friction theory under isothermal assumption. Due to the quasi-static assumption, an explicit dynamic formulation is used with a scale mass matrix. A method is proposed to estimate from experimental data the temperature of the forming simulation. The evolution of the material properties versus the temperature is selected combining experimental results and bibliographic sources. The numerical model is validated using experimental data. A numerical analysis of the influence of blade size (thickness, width, length, depth) on the pressing force is described. Finally a fast model to estimate the required pressing force is proposed. A multi-input single-output model is used where the input are only defined by the geometrical parameters, the material and the temperature of the blade and the output is the pressing force. The model is approximated with a least square method based on FE simulation results. Comparisons are made between the fast and FE models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it