MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1513608832 · doi:10.1002/0470869127.ch10

Central Plasticity in Pathological Pain

2004· article· en· W1513608832 on OpenAlexafffund
Min Zhuo

Bibliographic record

VenueNovartis Foundation symposium · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCanada Research Chairs
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institute on Drug AbuseHealth CanadaNational Institutes of HealthNovartis FoundationUniversity of Washington
KeywordsNeuroscienceAnterior cingulate cortexPathologicalSynaptic plasticityNMDA receptorCognitionNeuroplasticityPsychologyBiologyMedicineReceptorInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neurons and synapses in the central nervous systems are very dynamic and plastic, and can undergo changes throughout life. Studies of molecular and cellular mechanisms of such changes not only provide important insight into how we learn and store new knowledge in our brains, but also reveal the mechanisms of pathological changes occurring following an injury. Here, we propose that while neuronal mechanisms underlying physiological functions such as learning and memory may share some common signalling molecules with abnormal or injury-related changes in the brain, distinct synaptic mechanisms are involved in pathological pain as compared with that of cognitive learning and memory. Using genetically altered mice and classic physiological approaches, we showed that N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor-dependent, calcium-calmodulin-activated adenylyl cyclases (AC1 and AC8) in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) play important roles in the induction and expression of persistent inflammatory and neuropathic pain. In contrast, acute pain was not significantly affected. Calcium-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV, which is widely expressed in central areas related to pain and memory, primarily contributes to injury-related fearful memory and emotional responses. Our studies suggest distinct signalling pathways are responsible for physiological responses to the injury, including behavioural, emotional and memory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNovartis Foundation symposiumSame topicPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207