MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1513708690 · doi:10.53841/bpsptr.2019.25.2.119

Behavior Modification: What it is and how to do it

2019· article· en· W1513708690 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Garry, Joseph J. Pear, Chrissie Fitch

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychology Teaching Review · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicBehavioral and Psychological Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyMathematics educationHigher educationPedagogyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The behaviour modification approach - introduction areas of application - an overview basic behavioural principles and procedures - getting a behaviour to occur more often with positive reinforcement decreasing a behaviour with extinction getting a new behaviour to occur - an application of shaping developing behavioural persistance through the use of intermittent reinforcement types of intermittent reinforcement to decrease behaviour doing the right thing at the right time is a matter for stimulus discrimination training developing appropriate behaviour with fading developing and maintaining behaviour with conditioned reinforcement getting a new behaviour to occur with behavioural changing transferring behaviour to new settings and making it last - generality of behaviour change eliminating inappropriate behaviour through punishment establishing a desirable behaviour by using escape and avoidance conditioning procedures based on principles of respondent conditioning some preliminary considerations to effective programming strategies - short-cuts tactics with stimulus control - instruction, modeling, guidance, and situational inducement alternative strategies for decreasing behaviour dealing with data - behavioural assessment - initial considerations direct behavioural assessment - what to record and how doing research in behaviour modification putting it all together - designing a programme to overcome a behavioural handicap token economies helping an individual to develop self-control systematic self-desensitization cognitive behaviour modification areas of clinical behaviour therapy behaviour modification - a rapidly growing concern - giving it all some perspective - a brief history.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.284
GPT teacher head0.460
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations468
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychology Teaching ReviewSame topicBehavioral and Psychological StudiesFrench-language works237,207