MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1513770463 · doi:10.1080/02255189.2007.9669185

The Big-Push Approach to African Development and Local Capacity Building: Understanding the Issues

2007· article· en· W1513770463 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Getachew Mequanent, D. R. Fraser Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Issues in South Africa
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacity buildingPoverty reductionPovertyLocal DevelopmentPolitical scienceEconomic growthEnvironmental planningBusinessRegional scienceGeographyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This article discusses the “big-push” approach to Africa's development and its implications for local-level processes. This approach has enhanced the role of national governments in development planning along with a focus on building the capacity of public sectors. It is argued that building strong capacity from below is equally important to initiate and support sustained action on poverty reduction. The article thus presents a brief case study of the role and functions of the kebele (local) administrations in Ethiopia along with a practical planning framework to help understand the issues involved in the planning of local capacity building.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développementSame topicLegal Issues in South AfricaFrench-language works237,207