MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1513901389 · doi:10.26522/vp.v10i2.850

Utopia literaria. Le dépaysement de Jean-Christophe Bailly

2013· article· fr· W1513901389 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Amélie Calderone, Carolina Cunha Carnier, Blaise Djomaleu Kamadeu

Bibliographic record

VenueVoix Plurielles · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Cultural and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Véritable questionnement, Le dépaysement est une quête de l’essence de ce que l’on appelle par habitude et/ou par facilité « France », et une enquête. Jean-Christophe Bailly se fait voyageur – Wanderer – et, à travers les lieux, les monuments, la population, ou encore les objets, l’on voit se dérouler sous nos yeux une « histoire des traces » : la reconstitution d’une identité grâce à des indices perçus au fil de voyages menés sur le territoire. L’œuvre se constitue pour une large part comme une enquête, bien que non systématique : elle est essai de « déchiffrement » des paysages français, tentative d’y apercevoir des « échos soulevés en passant » à partir desquels « l’intuition d’un récit » pourra naître. Une dynamique spécifique travaille ainsi en profondeur un texte au sein duquel deux systèmes sémiotiques s’imbriquent : le paysage d’une part, diffusant des signaux qui composent une image fluctuante et mobile de la France, image organisée, pour reprendre les termes de Bailly, comme une « pelote complexe et enchevêtrée où époques, affects et dimensions s’entremêlent » ; l’écriture d’autre part, qui essaye de rendre compte de la multiplicité et de la complexité de ce phénomène.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.007
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVoix PluriellesSame topicDiverse Cultural and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207