The Impact of the Automatic Balancing Mechanism for the Public Pension in Japan on the Extreme Elderly
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most developed countries are seeking ways to maintain a sustainable social security system. Japan is no exception. The old-age dependency ratio in Japan is currently 35% and is expected to be 74% in 2050. Recently the Japanese government has adopted an automatic balancing mechanism, which gradually reduces the real price of the public pension through a reduction of inflation adjustments. The reduction, depending on future demographics, is a random process, so the elderly, in particular the extreme elderly, have to take the risk of receiving an inadequate public pension. The objectives of this paper are threefold. First, we review the recent trends in Japanese mortality and explain the underlying longevity issues that led to the automatic balancing mechanism. Second, by means of stochastic mortality and fertility modeling, we analyze how demographic changes will affect the future of public pensions in Japan. Third, we demonstrate, on the basis of the stochastic projections we made, how the automatic balancing mechanism will affect the financial security for people who live beyond age 100.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".