MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1514174664 · doi:10.3133/i2726

Stratigraphic framework and depositional sequences in the lower Silurian regional oil and gas accumulation, Appalachian Basin: From Jackson County, Ohio, through northwestern Pennsylvania, to Orleans County, New York

2000· report· en· W1514174664 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert T. Ryder

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSedimentary depositional environmentGeologyStructural basinArchaeologyPaleontologyGeomorphologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lower Silurian sandstone units constitute the reservoir rock for a regionally extensive oil and gas accumulation in the central Appalachian basin (fig. 1A). The accumulation, referred to here as the Lower Silurian regional oil and gas accumulation, has been drilled and produced since the early 1880’s. To date, approximately 300 million barrels of oil and six to eight trillion cubic feet of gas have been produced from it in the United States and Ontario, Canada (McCormac and others, 1996; Miller, 1975; State oil and gas reports such as New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, 1998). The domi­ nant reservoirs are the “Clinton” and Medina sandstones in Ohio and westernmost West Virginia and the Medina Group (Grimsby Sandstone/Grimsby Formation and Whirlpool Sandstone) in northwestern Pennsylvania and western New York. A secondary reservoir in the Lower Silurian regional oil and gas accumulation is the Upper Ordovician(?) and Lower Silurian Tuscarora Sandstone (fig. 1A), a more proximal eastern facies of the “Clinton” sandstone and Medina Group (Yeakel, 1962; Cotter, 1982; Castle, 1998). On the basis of subtle variations, the regional accumulation is tentatively subdivided by Ryder (1998) into three parts: (1) an eastern gas-bearing part having many characteristics of basincentered accumulation (Davis, 1984; Zagorski, 1988, 1991; Law and Spencer, 1993); (2) a western gas-bearing part having characteristics of discrete fields such as a gas-water contact; and (3) a central oiland gas-bearing hybrid part having characteris­ tics of both discrete and basin-centered accumulation (Zagorski, 1996) (fig. 1A). Whereas the oil and (or) gas in the hybrid and discrete parts of the regional accumulation in Ohio are largely depleted except in the Lake Erie offshore (de Witt, 1993), gas continues to be discovered in the deeper basin-centered part of the Appalachian basin (Zagorski, 1991; Pees, 1994; Petroleum Information Corporation, 1994). The Tuscarora Sandstone is tentatively identified here with the basin-centered part of the regional accumulation (fig. 1A). However, only small quantities of gas have been produced from the Tuscarora Sandstone because of its generally poor reservoir quality and because of the low energy (Btu) content of the gas (Avary, 1996). To better understand the character and origin of the regional oil and gas accumulation and its component parts, six cross sec­ tions were drawn through the Lower Silurian sequence in parts of New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. The loca­ tions of the cross sections are shown on figure 1A and B, and preliminary results are reported in Ryder and others (1996), Keighin and Hettinger (1997), and Keighin (1998). Each cross section shows the stratigraphic framework, depositional setting, sequence stratigraphy, and hydrocarbon-producing intervals of the Lower Silurian sandstone reservoirs and adjoining strata. Cross section A–A’ presented here is about 450 mi long and trends northeastward, approximately subparallel to the deposi­ tional strike of the Lower Silurian sandstone system. Moreover, section A–A’ extends through large stretches of the basin-cen­ tered and hybrid parts of the regional accumulation. The remaining five cross sections are oriented approximately normal to and in part oblique to the depositional strike of the Lower Silurian sandstone system and they connect with section A–A’ (fig. 1A and B). Two of these cross sections (E–E’ and F–F’) tra­ verse the entire Lower Silurian regional oil and gas accumulation and its discrete, hybrid, and basin-centered parts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.302
Threshold uncertainty score0.601

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis→French-language works237,207→