Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Queen Anne's War was the name given to the War of the Spanish Succession within the English, French, and Spanish colonies on the North American continent, ranging from La France Septentrionale (New France or French Canada) in the Northwest to Spanish Florida in the Southeast, with the main English colonies within New England and the Province of Carolina lying in between. The war was the second of three colonial conflicts spanning the late seventeenth and eighteenth centuries (the other two were King William's War, 1688–1697, and the French Indian War, 1754–1763) fought principally between France and Britain alongside their native Indian allies for continental supremacy. The origins and progress of each war are found in a confluence of European events and local circumstance. In the early eighteenth century there was considerable anxiety among the English colonists that under the terms of the deceased (November 1701) and childless Spanish King Carlos II's will, the French Bourbon inheritance through Louis XIV's grandson, Philip, duc d'Anjou, of the Spanish throne and empire threatened a Franco‐Spanish trading bloc which would not only render the settlements vulnerable locally but also tip the continental balance of power in France's favor. Such European events overlay a history of frontier clashes and tension between the various colonists which had continued — albeit mainly through the respective native Indian proxies — since the conclusion of King William's War.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.054 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".