MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1514340919

The Politics of Mental Health Care in Nova Scotia: The Case of the Halifax County Hospital, 1940-1976

2005· article· en· W1514340919 on OpenAlexaffabout
Judith Fingard, J. S. Rütherford

Bibliographic record

VenueÉrudit (Université de Montréal) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHistorical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaStaffingMental healthGovernment (linguistics)PoliticsLegislationPublic administrationWelfarePolitical scienceMedicineBusinessNursingGeographyPsychiatryLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AFTER THE SECOND WORLD WAR, significant changes occurred in the care of the mentally ill in Canada as the government moved toward the adoption of national health insurance. Reforms were encouraged by the introduction in 1948 of federal health grants channelled through the provinces to train mental health professionals, construct new facilities and support research. In return for the injection of federal funds, the mental hospitals controlled by the provinces were required to admit patients free of charge. Subsequently, mental hospitals were excluded from the provisions of the Hospital Insurance and Diagnostic Services Act of 1958, an exclusion that became more serious as the federal health grants were phased out. Some of the provinces – Ontario (in part), Quebec and Nova Scotia – eventually corrected this anomaly. Nova Scotia, which adopted hospital insurance in 1959, extended coverage to its mental hospitals in 1966 and 1967.1 The records of one of those hospitals, the Halifax County Hospital (HCH), the hospital that is the subject of this paper, indicate that the new government financing was implemented in halting, uncertain stages. While the hospital’s management and administration welcomed federally enhanced provincial funding for construction, drugs, staffing and programming, the fate of the patients depended on system-wide improvements that were slow in coming. Ultimately, it was the social-welfare legislation of the late-1950s and mid-1960s (also made possible by federal funding) as much as the health care reforms that determined mental health practice. Each mental hospital in Canada experienced the political and economic changes of the post-war period differently and was influenced not only by federal and provincial policies but also by its location, staff, management and the composition of its patient population. All of these hospitals, however, shared certain key developments. Hospital practice was revolutionized by changes in treatment, especially by the transition to community care and the introduction of effective drug therapy. Prominent among the measures that led to the depopulation of the mental hospitals were the unlocking of doors, encouragement of short-term leave, introduction of new social therapies and rehabilitative programming, establishment of out-patient services, day-care and night programmes, access to sheltered workshops, initiation of support

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.912

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0230.007
Scholarly communication0.0080.001
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉrudit (Université de Montréal)Same topicHistorical Psychiatry and Medical PracticesFrench-language works237,207