MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1514576082

Increasing Patient Involvement in Health Professional Education

2015· article· en· W1514576082 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Melissa Ng, Jenny E. Chu

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth professional student journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipHealth careHealth professionalsProfessional developmentMedical educationWork (physics)MedicineNursingPsychologyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patient-centred care is a concept taught throughout the health disciplines, but the expertise of the patient in their own experiences and unique needs is often neglected. Increasing patient involvement in education is an essential stepping-stone towards a partnership model of patient-health professional communication in practice, and there is much room for development and expansion, especially in health professional education at UBC. In this opinion paper, we discuss the rationale for patient-educators and present examples of activities for student involvement, based on our work in the Division of Health Care Communication. The UBC medical program is presented as a focus for discussion, with implications for all health disciplines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.288
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.277
GPT teacher head0.527
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth professional student journalSame topicPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207