MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1514654658

On the Relationship between the Specialty Set-Up of Secondary Vocational Education and Regional Industrial Structure in Tibet

2015· article· en· W1514654658 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Can Guo, Peng Ou

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHigher Education and Teaching Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVocational educationAdaptabilityPromotion (chess)SpecialtySet (abstract data type)BusinessLocal economic developmentEconomic growthEconomic systemEconomicsComputer sciencePolitical scienceManagementPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The specially set-up of vocational education should meet the demand of regional economic development to adapt the requirement of adjustment, promotion and optimization of regional industrial structure. By investigation of the specially set-up of secondary vocational education and the regional industrial structure, we found that specialty of secondary education does not meet the demand of economic development. And the number of enrollments and the proportion of economic structure is uncoordinated, so it could not fulfil the talent demand for economic development. Therefore, it needs to optimize the structure of specially set-up to adapt the requirement of regional economic development. Therefore, it needs to change their adaptability and promote the development of vocational education and the economy in Tibet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.158
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicHigher Education and Teaching MethodsFrench-language works237,207