MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1514662303 · doi:10.25755/int.6740

Perspectivas face à educação inclusiva: um estudo em escolas do meio rural algarvio

2015· article· pt· W1514662303 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joel Santos, Margarida César

Bibliographic record

VenueRevistas SARC · 2015
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation in Rural Contexts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A diversidade é uma riqueza que importa saber preservar e apreciar (César, 2012b). Em Portugal, a região do Algarve apresenta um elevado índice de insucesso académico, sobretudo no 3.º ciclo do ensino básico (INE, 2009). Este fenómeno é mais frequente nos meios rurais (INE-DRA, 2004). Alguns autores observam conexões entre a construção de cenários educativos (mais) inclusivos, nos meios rurais, e as perspectivas assumidas por professores, alunos e encarregados de educação face à Educação Inclusiva (EI) (Loreman, Lupart, McGhie-Richmond, & Barber, 2008; Loreman, McGhie-Richmond, Barber, & Lupart, 2009; McGhie-Richmond, Barber, Lupart, & Loreman, 2009). O objectivo principal desta investigação consiste em conhecer as perspectivas face EI dos professores, alunos e encarregados de educação, referentes a escolas do 3.º ciclo do ensino básico regular diurno, nas áreas predominantemente rurais, da região do Algarve. Assumindo um paradigma interpretativo (Denzin, 2002), desenvolvemos um estudo de caso intrínseco (Stake, 1995). Os participantes são 151 professores, 471 alunos e 455 encarregados de educação. Os instrumentos de recolha de dados são a recolha documental e três escalas: (1) a escala TPIRC – Teacher Perceptions of Inclusion in Rural Canada (McGhie-Richmond et al., 2009); (2) a escala SPIRC – Student Perceptions of Inclusion in Rural Canada (Loreman et al., 2008); e (3) a escala PPIERC – Parent Perspectives on Inclusive Education in Rural Canada (Loreman et al., 2009). Este estudo mostra que os professores, alunos e respectivos encarregados de educação assumem perspectivas pouco inclusivas. Os alunos e encarregados de educação seleccionam posições pouco inclusivas face ao acesso ao envolvimento na comunidade. A análise dos dados permite inferir que muitos destes participantes se confrontam com formas subtis de exclusão cultural, o que sublinha a necessidade de facilitar o acesso a formas mais inclusivas de participação social.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevistas SARCSame topicEducation in Rural ContextsFrench-language works237,207