MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1514665307 · doi:10.1002/cjs.11201

An accurate test for the equality of covariance matrices from decomposable graphical Gaussian models

2014· article· en· W1514665307 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Yanyan Wu, Hélène Massam, Augustine Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Statistics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsCovarianceGaussianCovariance matrixStatisticStatisticsEstimation of covariance matricesApplied mathematicsGraphical modelMarkov chainCovariance functionTest statisticStatistical hypothesis testing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper derives a saddlepoint based approximation for the cumulative distribution function of the Bartlett–Box M‐statistic that tests the equality of covariance matrices for several samples from graphical Gaussian models Markov with respect to a decomposable graph . The proposed saddlepoint‐based method has third‐order accuracy ( ). Simulation results show that the proposed method has extremely good coverage properties even when the sample size is small. We apply our method to the well‐known Call Centre data set and show that the covariance matrix is not constant through time.The Canadian Journal of Statistics42: 61–77; 2014 © 2014 Statistical Society of Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.132
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.132
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of StatisticsSame topicBayesian Modeling and Causal InferenceFrench-language works237,207