Infrared spectra of helium clusters seeded with nitrous oxide, HeN4–N2O, with N=1–80
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High resolution infrared spectra of HeN-N2O clusters are studied in the 2200 cm(-1) region of the N2O nu1 fundamental band. The clusters are produced in a pulsed supersonic jet expansion from a cooled nozzle source and probed using a tunable diode laser operating in a rapid-scan mode. Three isotopic forms are used (14N14N16O, 15N14N16O, and 15N15N16O) in order to support the spectral analyses. For clusters up to N approximately 24, the individual spectra are resolved, assigned, and analyzed together with complementary microwave data. Assignments for larger clusters are uncertain due to overlapping transitions, but an approximate analysis is still possible for N approximately 25-80. Compared to helium clusters containing the related CO2 or OCS molecules, the rotational dynamics of HeN-N2O clusters show similarities but also important differences. In particular, HeN-N2O has more irregular behavior in the range of N=6-17, indicating that conventional molecular structure plays a greater role. In general terms, these differences can be attributed to a greater degree of angular anisotropy in the He-N2O intermolecular potential.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".