Yukon 2000: A Community-Based Planning Effort to Preserve “Things That Matter”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the late 1980s, the Yukon’s New Democratic Party ( NDP ) government proved that an essentially community-based process could be used to plan the economic and environmental future of a vast sparsely populated region. The government was successful because the community-based approach was implemented systematically and comprehensively, with considerable effort invested in outreach to communities and citizens, before analyses began and recommendations emerged. The planning process used in the Yukon had two additional essential features: (1) it assumed that community needs had to be met if a quality strategy was to develop; and (2) it emphasized capacity building to increase local self-reliance and innovation. Communities and regions contemplating a decentralized approach to regional strategic planning, involving citizens extensively in the planning effort, can learn from the Yukon’s experience. However, areas with larger populations will have to be creative in developing means, such as those discussed in Weeks (2000) and Bryson and Anderson (2000), to assure widespread citizen and stakeholder involvement. One factor critical to the success of these efforts has been, and continues to be, the catalytic leadership of the Yukon’s Territorial government (Luke, 1998).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".