MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Burden of Chronic Kidney Disease in Renal Transplant Recipients

2004· article· en· W1514806186 on OpenAlexaff
Vanji Karthikeyan, Jolanta Karpinski, Rama C. Nair, Greg Knoll

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Transplantation · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineKidney diseaseKidneyRenal transplantInternal medicineIntensive care medicineKidney transplantKidney transplantationUrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The National Kidney Foundation has developed guidelines for the diagnosis and classification of chronic kidney disease (CKD) but it is not known whether these are applicable to renal transplant recipients. This study determined the prevalence of CKD according to the stages defined in the guidelines, the complications related to CKD and whether the prevalence of complications was related to CKD stage in 459 renal transplant recipients. CKD was present in 412 patients (90%) and 60% were in CKD Stage 3 with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) between 30 and 59 mL/min/1.73 m2. The prevalence of anemia increased from 0% in Stage 1 to 33% in Stage 5 (p < 0.001). Hypertension was present in 86% and increased from 60% in Stage 1 to 100% in Stage 5 (p = 0.02). The number of anti hypertensives per patient increased from 0.7 in Stage 1 to 2.3 in Stage 5 (p < 0.001). The number of CKD complications per patient increased from 1.1 in Stage 1 to 2.7 in Stage 5 (p < 0.001). We conclude that CKD and the complications of CKD are highly prevalent in renal transplant recipients. The classification of renal transplant patients by CKD stage may help clinicians identify patients at increased risk and target appropriate therapy to improve outcomes. The National Kidney Foundation has developed guidelines for the diagnosis and classification of chronic kidney disease (CKD) but it is not known whether these are applicable to renal transplant recipients. This study determined the prevalence of CKD according to the stages defined in the guidelines, the complications related to CKD and whether the prevalence of complications was related to CKD stage in 459 renal transplant recipients. CKD was present in 412 patients (90%) and 60% were in CKD Stage 3 with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) between 30 and 59 mL/min/1.73 m2. The prevalence of anemia increased from 0% in Stage 1 to 33% in Stage 5 (p < 0.001). Hypertension was present in 86% and increased from 60% in Stage 1 to 100% in Stage 5 (p = 0.02). The number of anti hypertensives per patient increased from 0.7 in Stage 1 to 2.3 in Stage 5 (p < 0.001). The number of CKD complications per patient increased from 1.1 in Stage 1 to 2.7 in Stage 5 (p < 0.001). We conclude that CKD and the complications of CKD are highly prevalent in renal transplant recipients. The classification of renal transplant patients by CKD stage may help clinicians identify patients at increased risk and target appropriate therapy to improve outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations153
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of TransplantationSame topicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207