De quelle intégration s’agit-il? Immigration : de l’altérité à la lutte pour la reconnaissance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Integration is a complex phenomenon which embraces all aspects of individual and social existence. It implies uprooting from exclusive belonging, knowing that contact between cultures necessarily alters their integrity thus leading to newly composed identities. That means a fixed definition based on an essentialized origin is an illusion because the unique trajectories of the social actors evolving in the spaces where they meet are subject to constant remodelling, unless self-ghettoization occurs. However, building an anthroposocial vision is fundamental to understanding the new social and identity compositions at work in the social fabric and recognizing them as plural public practices, thus legitimate and meaningful at the very heart of the city not as appendices that can be added or removed according to the interests of the moment. The issue is to establish a balance between the unique efforts by which the actors assert themselves as subjects combining specific characteristics and universal values. As can be seen in the case of Mx, that implies skill development to accept inner differentiation, to face tensions and conflicts, and to escape assigned roles and status in order to reclaim both equality and differences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".