MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1515130764 · doi:10.11948/2011037

ROBUST SYNCHRONIZATION OF PARAMETRIZED NONAUTONOMOUS DISCRETE SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS TO COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS

2011· article· en· W1515130764 on OpenAlexaff
Hildebrando M. Rodrigues, Marcio Gameiro

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Analysis & Computation · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscretizationSynchronization (alternating current)Lorenz systemControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceChaoticNonlinear systemCommunications systemComponent (thermodynamics)MATLABSynchronization of chaosChaotic systemsSIGNAL (programming language)Master/slaveMathematicsTelecommunicationsMathematical analysisPhysicsArtificial intelligenceControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study synchronization of a coupled discrete system consisting of a Master System and a Slave System. The Master System usually exhibits chaotic or complicated behavior and transmits a signal with a chaotic component to the Slave System. The Slave System then recovers the original signal and removes the chaotic component. To ensure secured communication, the Master and the Slave systems must synchronize independent of the variation of the systems parameters and initial conditions. Here we develop a general approach and obtain some general results for synchronization of such coupled systems naturally arising from discretization of well-know continuous systems, and we illustrate general results with two specific examples:the discretized Lorenz system and a discretized nonlinear oscillator. We also present some simulations using MatLab to illustrate our discussions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Analysis & ComputationSame topicNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern FormationFrench-language works237,207