MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1515143919

Proceedings of the 23rd annual international conference on Design of communication: documenting & designing for pervasive information

2005· article· en· W1515143919 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Design of Communication · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicUsability and User Interface Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDocumentationContext (archaeology)Event (particle physics)HypertextWorld Wide WebSoftware documentationDisciplineLibrary scienceHypermediaComputer scienceSoftwareEngineeringHistorySoftware developmentSociologySoftware development processSocial scienceArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Welcome to Coventry and SIGDOC 2005. This year's conference marks a major step for the SIG, the first time its annual conference has been staged outside North America. In addition to the traditional mainstays of the conference, the USA, Canada and the UK, the authors whose papers are included in these proceedings hail also from the Switzerland, Germany, Italy, Israel, the Netherlands and Brazil. The conference also marks a further broadening of the range of disciplines contributing to an event which has always been notable for its cross-disciplinary nature. Originally, when the SIG was founded by John Rigo in 1976, the 'DOC' in SIGDOC stood for 'documentation'. As a result the conference was supported mainly be technical writers and software engineers, a mix which resulted in many lively debates between these two groups of people, resulting in the chance for both communities to place their work in a wider context than is afforded by single discipline forums. However, the nature of both computer software and its documentation has changed radically since the inception of the SIG. Software documentation is nowadays often implemented using hypermedia technologies and may include embedded video, animation and sound. It is as likely to be delivered in real time over the web as it is to be published, packaged and delivered physically with the product which it documents. As a result of these changes in 2003 the 'DOC' was recast as 'Design Of Communication' -- a title which clearly voices what the conference is now all about: principles, methods and technologies for the design of communication between humans using computer technology as a medium. It is from this more recent mandate for the conference that the theme for this year's event arises -- 'Documenting and Designing for Pervasive Information'. We find ourselves in the middle of a major paradigm shift in computing - the advent of ubiquitous or pervasive computing, in which computerized devices pervade our technological environment. This results in a vast increase in potential means for the production, storage and delivery of information. In the pervasive computing world information products are as likely to be produced by global collaborations as they are by single authors. Rather than residing in single repositories, they may be distributed over many computing devices collaborating in ad-hoc arrangements. Instead of being delivered on a standardized desktop machine, they may be delivered on PDA's, cellphones, wearable devices and other, yet to be developed interfaces. For 'designers of communication' this new paradigm offers new questions concerning how we design our communications products, the methods we use, the concerns of usability and availability, the potential and pitfalls of pervasive information technologies. SIGDOC authors have responded with the papers that you will find in this document. Broadly, they are grouped under five headings: · Information Design Principles and Methods The ever changing nature of 'documents', particularly in the pervasive computing environment, requires continual development of the methodology of design of these information products. Five papers present a range of work on this topic, from both information designers and computer scientists. · Usability perennial topic for SIGDOC, which has traditionally taken advantage of its multidisciplinary nature to take a wider view on the topic than pure 'HCI'. This year's four papers are no exception. · Document Authoring, Production and Management The traditional topic for the conference, now seen in the context of hypermedia and web-centric documentation by the four papers included here. · Graphical and Visual Information Reflecting the broadening base of SIGDOC into graphical and visual design, five papers explore the potential of non-verbal communication media and design methods for them. · Pervasive Documentation Systems This year's theme has inspired the production of these six papers, which explore the design concerns of pervasive information from a range of viewpoints, including cultural, organizational and technical. .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score0.969

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0050.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it