MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1515143919

Proceedings of the 23rd annual international conference on Design of communication: documenting & designing for pervasive information

2005· article· en· W1515143919 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Conference on Design of Communication · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueUsability and User Interface Design
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDocumentationContext (archaeology)Event (particle physics)HypertextWorld Wide WebSoftware documentationDisciplineLibrary scienceHypermediaComputer scienceSoftwareEngineeringHistorySoftware developmentSociologySoftware development processSocial scienceArchaeology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Welcome to Coventry and SIGDOC 2005. This year's conference marks a major step for the SIG, the first time its annual conference has been staged outside North America. In addition to the traditional mainstays of the conference, the USA, Canada and the UK, the authors whose papers are included in these proceedings hail also from the Switzerland, Germany, Italy, Israel, the Netherlands and Brazil. The conference also marks a further broadening of the range of disciplines contributing to an event which has always been notable for its cross-disciplinary nature. Originally, when the SIG was founded by John Rigo in 1976, the 'DOC' in SIGDOC stood for 'documentation'. As a result the conference was supported mainly be technical writers and software engineers, a mix which resulted in many lively debates between these two groups of people, resulting in the chance for both communities to place their work in a wider context than is afforded by single discipline forums. However, the nature of both computer software and its documentation has changed radically since the inception of the SIG. Software documentation is nowadays often implemented using hypermedia technologies and may include embedded video, animation and sound. It is as likely to be delivered in real time over the web as it is to be published, packaged and delivered physically with the product which it documents. As a result of these changes in 2003 the 'DOC' was recast as 'Design Of Communication' -- a title which clearly voices what the conference is now all about: principles, methods and technologies for the design of communication between humans using computer technology as a medium. It is from this more recent mandate for the conference that the theme for this year's event arises -- 'Documenting and Designing for Pervasive Information'. We find ourselves in the middle of a major paradigm shift in computing - the advent of ubiquitous or pervasive computing, in which computerized devices pervade our technological environment. This results in a vast increase in potential means for the production, storage and delivery of information. In the pervasive computing world information products are as likely to be produced by global collaborations as they are by single authors. Rather than residing in single repositories, they may be distributed over many computing devices collaborating in ad-hoc arrangements. Instead of being delivered on a standardized desktop machine, they may be delivered on PDA's, cellphones, wearable devices and other, yet to be developed interfaces. For 'designers of communication' this new paradigm offers new questions concerning how we design our communications products, the methods we use, the concerns of usability and availability, the potential and pitfalls of pervasive information technologies. SIGDOC authors have responded with the papers that you will find in this document. Broadly, they are grouped under five headings: · Information Design Principles and Methods The ever changing nature of 'documents', particularly in the pervasive computing environment, requires continual development of the methodology of design of these information products. Five papers present a range of work on this topic, from both information designers and computer scientists. · Usability perennial topic for SIGDOC, which has traditionally taken advantage of its multidisciplinary nature to take a wider view on the topic than pure 'HCI'. This year's four papers are no exception. · Document Authoring, Production and Management The traditional topic for the conference, now seen in the context of hypermedia and web-centric documentation by the four papers included here. · Graphical and Visual Information Reflecting the broadening base of SIGDOC into graphical and visual design, five papers explore the potential of non-verbal communication media and design methods for them. · Pervasive Documentation Systems This year's theme has inspired the production of these six papers, which explore the design concerns of pervasive information from a range of viewpoints, including cultural, organizational and technical. .

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Méthodes · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,877
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,969

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,002
Science ouverte0,0050,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,093
Tête enseignante GPT0,320
Écart entre enseignants0,227 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle