MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1515179572 · doi:10.25071/1920-7336.21253

Un regard sur la domesticité juvénile en Haïti

2002· article· en· W1515179572 on OpenAlex
Irdèle Lubin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRefuge Canada s Journal on Refuge · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Identity, and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClothingLegislationOrder (exchange)Service (business)Political scienceSociologyBusinessLawEconomyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

‘Domestic Children’, ‘Service Children’ or ‘restavèk’ (‘livein’) - such are some of the appellations given to young girls and boys placed in host families in order to serve them. In exchange, these host families are supposed to cater for some of their basic needs (food, shelter, clothing), and in due course, to pay for their school fees. These children are ill treated, humiliated and considered as the lowest of the low in the family. They are treated as young slaves. They toil endlessly from morning to night, and are yet totally forgotten and attract hardly any interest. The legislation providing some degree of protection for them in the host families is totally disregarded and their rights ignored. This article focuses on the plight of Domestic Children in Haiti, the laws applicable to the situation, and the manner in which these children are living an existence deprived of rights in the country.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it