Les fruits de la foi et l’universalité de l’islam : une étude de cas sur l’activisme musulman en France1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article étudie le type de relations qui existent entre l’islam, entendu comme une tradition universalisante, et l’espace social sur lequel la République française affirme sa souveraineté. Comme tel, il cherche à reformuler le débat autour de la relation entre l’islam et la France d’une manière qui évite la dichotomie entre orientations nationale et transnationale. Son analyse se centre sur le cas de Sofiane Meziani, écrivain et militant associé à une importante fédération islamique française qui a déployé des efforts significatifs pour consolider sa position en France ces dix dernières années. L’étude du cas de Sofiane permet de cerner les effets politiques à la fois habilitants et contraignants qui dérivent de cet engagement discursif et pratique de l’islam dans le contexte français, plus particulièrement celui de la banlieue. Elle permet aussi d’examiner comment ces effets définissent la manière dont Sofiane peut se rapporter à la communauté plus générale de l’ummaet concevoir son identité française, et comment, enfin, son engagement interagit avec la narration de sa biographie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".