MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1515640953 · doi:10.1271/bbb.120693

Gene Analysis, Expression, and Characterization of an Intracellular α-Amylase from the Extremely Halophilic Archaeon <i>Haloarcula japonica</i>

2013· article· en· W1515640953 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Masahiko Onodera, Rie Yatsunami, Wataru Tsukimura, Toshiaki Fukui, Kaoru Nakasone, Tomonori Takashina, Satoshi Nakamura

Bibliographic record

VenueBioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnzyme Production and Characterization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDaiichi Sankyo EuropeNational Institutes of Natural SciencesDalhousie UniversityDaiichi-SankyoMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
KeywordsAmylopectinAmyloseAmylaseBiochemistryBiologyGeneMolecular biologyPeptide sequenceJaponicaHalophileSequence analysisEnzymeStarchGeneticsBacteriaBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Haloarcula japonica is an extremely halophilic archaeon that requires high concentrations of NaCl to grow. Recently the draft genome sequence of Ha. japonica was determined, and a gene encoding an α-amylase, malA, was identified. The deduced amino acid sequence of MalA, consisting of 663 amino acids, showed homology to α-amylase family enzymes. The sequence did not contain a secretion signal sequence, indicating that the protein is a cytoplasmic enzyme. Transcription of the malA gene was confirmed by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR, and the transcription start site was determined by a 5'-RACE experiment. The malA gene was cloned and expressed in Ha. japonica. The recombinant MalA was purified and characterized. MalA required a high concentration of NaCl for starch-hydrolyzing activity. It showed higher activity on soluble starch, amylose, and amylopectin, and lower activity on glycogen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioscience Biotechnology and BiochemistrySame topicEnzyme Production and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207