MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1515694544

Zalmteelt in Brits Columbia, Canada

2009· article· nl· W1515694544 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M.J. Huiskamp

Bibliographic record

VenueAquacultuur · 2009
Typearticle
Languagenl
FieldEnergy
TopicEnergy, Environment, Agriculture Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheologyStage (stratigraphy)ArtPhilosophyBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Als student aan de Landbouwuniversiteit in Wageningen heb je, wanneer je op stage wil gaan, bijna onbegrensde mogelijkheden. Ook bij de vakgroep Visteelt en Visserij zijn de landen waar een stage gel open kan worden onbeperkt, als er maar water is. In september 1992 wilde ik op stage gaan, en zoveel mogelijk over zalmteelt te weten komen. Na gesproken te hebben met een student die goede ervaringen in Brits Columbia (B.C.), Canada had opgedaan, besloot ik daar op stage te gaan. Eenmaal aangekomen op het bedrijf, een smolt-producerend bedrijf, bleek dat de centrale verwarming er niet was, dus elke dag hout hakken of kou lijden. Grote verschillen dus met Nederland

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.390
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAquacultuurSame topicEnergy, Environment, Agriculture AnalysisFrench-language works237,207