L’identité narrative comme processus de négociation des frontières entre groupes minoritaires et majoritaires
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article explore l’identité individuelle comme ayant une dimension sociale fondamentale à travers les processus de différenciation et de hiérarchisation sociale qui permettent la création, la reproduction et la transformation des frontières entre groupes majoritaires et minoritaires. Ces frontières rendent opératoires les différences entre les groupes gérées comme ressources symboliques à partir desquelles les individus négocient leur subjectivité. Nous proposons que la notion d’identité narrative de Paul Ricœur permet de voir cette négociation à l’œuvre et de comprendre l’établissement des frontières du point de vue de l’agentivité de l’acteur. Nous en faisons la démonstration en analysant des extraits de la commission Bouchard-Taylor, une consultation sur les minorités culturelles qui a eu lieu au Québec en 2007 et 2008.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".