MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1515842966 · doi:10.7202/016555ar

Lecours, André (dir.), New Institutionalism. Theory and Analysis, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2005, 366 p.

2007· article· en· W1515842966 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Raúl Bernal-Meza, Gustavo Alberto Masera

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes internationales · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Theory and Institutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNew institutionalismInstitutionalismHumanitiesSociologyMedia studiesPolitical scienceArtPoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lecours, André (dir.), New Institutionalism. Theory and Analysis, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2005, 366 p.. Un article de la revue Études internationales (Volume 38, numéro 3, septembre 2007, p. 311-462) diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.171

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.011
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.009
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes internationalesSame topicEconomic Theory and InstitutionsFrench-language works237,207