MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1515843655 · doi:10.1109/isscs.2015.7203995

An embedded low-overhead PLL-based countermeasure against DPA side channel attack

2015· article· en· W1515843655 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptographic Implementations and Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower analysisComputer scienceEncryptionSide channel attackAdvanced Encryption StandardEmbedded systemOverhead (engineering)CountermeasurePhase-locked loopCryptographyComputer networkEngineeringComputer securityTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Side channels attacks are considered among physical, noninvasive methods employed to obtain private key of cryptographic devices such as smart cards. In this paper, a new approach for countermeasure against Differential Power Analysis (DPA) with an extremely low-area and -power overhead is proposed. The proposed method employs a Phase Locked Loop (PLL) which is placed in the power path of an Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) based encryption system. This method suppresses the power characteristic of the encryption system through both masking and hiding the private key information. Moreover, the proposed method is successful in maintaining high frequency operation of the encryption engine. The proposed method is implemented in TSMC CMOS 65nm technology. The protection circuit has only 5% area overhead, and 6% increase in power consumption, with frequency degradation of only 1%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score0.679

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it